Heading to the walk, I told my daughter SlutWalk is about celebrating girls and women. She said we should celebrate boys too.
Photo: Mari Milewski |
Boys who "can't help themselves" are boys who've been shamed into wrongly thinking this is in fact so.
Photo: Mari Milewski |
Girls and boys will engage in sex. Unfortunately, in the United States, they often do so unsafely because it is done in secret and in shame. And because girls have been told "boys can't help themselves," and that they themselves are "sluts" if they want sex.
Sexual repression backfires on itself in devastating ways. When sex is experienced as something forbidden and taboo, lust becomes shameful. Shame easily spirals into anger and resentment. And an ashamed person might direct those feelings against that which arouses him. Through disrespect and degradation. And in worse cases: physical violence and sexual assault.
Photo: Mari Milewski |
SlutWalk reminds us this isn't true. SlutWalk asks us to put the blame where it belongs.
You can't blame the victim. You have to blame the rapist.
Barbara Peterson who speaks in the above video also gave the concluding address at SlutWalk Minneapolis. Peterson spoke as the Vice President of Minnesota NOW--the multi-issue, grassroots advocate working for women's rights in Minnesota--and also as a Chicago police officer taking issue with the Toronto-based officer who incited the SlutWalk movement with his suggestion women bring rape onto themselves by dressing "like sluts." As Peterson pointed out, real men know how to control themselves. Real men can help themselves. Real men blame the rapist, not the rape victim.
Here's a video of the walk:
And here is Pioneer Press' feature on the walk with more photos. Excerpt:
Several hundred people - women, men and children - attended the march Saturday across the Mississippi River from downtown Minneapolis.And a substantial interview with the walk's lead organizer Kimberia Sherva is here. Excerpt:
A small number of them dressed in corsets, miniskirts, high heels and fishnet stockings to emphasize a message that provocative clothing is not a form of consent.
"This is a dress, not a 'yes,' " several signs proclaimed.
Patch: What can you say to a young man, in his teens or early twenties, to teach him and his peers how NOT to perpetuate the rape culture in our society?
Sherva: First of all, let’s say they’re going off to school to college and they go to a party, because that’s what happens, and let’s say there is a group of their guy friends and one of the guys says, "See that girl there, she’s kind of drunk, dude, I’m going to get lucky tonight." What’s the thing to do? Teach those young men to step up and say, “Dude, you’d better not, don’t you touch her, and if you DO try anything and we hear about it, that we will testify that this is what you said and you’re gonna go to jail, so you’d better think twice."
Sherva giving her thanks at the event
And teach them to have respect for their OWN bodies. Because boys can be raped, too. It might not be the physical overpowering that is the norm, but emotional overpowering. They have the right to say no, too, they don’t have to have sex. But through guilt or pressure they may be forced into it. Being able to state “I’m not up for that, I’m not ready for that, I don’t want that type of commitment yet” even when a partner states "Oh c’mon, you love me, you look so hot, I thought you really wanted this"—well, that goes both ways. For kids who always want to be seen as cool or popular, that’s a pressure cooker. It starts even in middle school, and it keeps perpetrating itself through high school, college, and into adulthood.
Kids need to learn what appropriate sexual behavior is and what is not, so that when they’re faced with the type of situation where they could become a victim or see a situation that could become one, they can say ‘I know what to do’, know how to stop it, and know that they are making the correct choice regardless of peer pressure.
It is not just rape victims. Nearly anything to do with sex and nudity condones the bullying of the victims, Consider naturist Stephen Gough who has been jailed for merely walking around nude. Violent anti-social drunks do not get the same punishment. See: http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/3826022/Naked-Rambler-Steve-Gough-costs-us-500000.html
ReplyDeleteThe American Association for Nude Recreation has published a "Nudists' Bill of Rights" because of the discrimination against them, see http://www.aanr.com/nudist-bill-of-rights
And although I don't condone it, youngsters who sext naked photos of themselves to friends, are threatened with distributing child pornography, on the grounds that they could become the subject of bullies. Some have committed suicide as a result, but the bullying is ignored, and the victim blamed, see http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/02/13/teens-nude-photos-and-the-law.html
If society really cared, the bullies would be in jail.
I might be missing something here, but this seems a bit one-sided. I totally agree that rape is NEVER the victims fault, and it is always 100% the choice of the perpetrator to rape another person. However - I have one or two male friends who think about sex a LOT more than the average person, and I think, like any addiction or struggle - it's kind of mean to flaunt something in front of them if they are not supposed to take it. It's rude to dangle chocolate in front of someone who struggles with over eating, or to serve pork to be antagonistic to people whose religious beliefs view pork as unclean. Granted these things aren't exactly the same, but there is still a level of respect that we should have for other people as well as ourselves and understand that because they struggle, we should be sensitive to their struggles and respond in kindness.... shouldn't we? Or is it now acceptable to jiggle our boobs in front of guys but then act like a victim if they reach up and grab them? (Again - obviously this is not always the case, but I think sometimes it is)
ReplyDeleteSloewen's comment is sensitive but misguided. The concept of respect spoken of is not really that but a recipe for living in fear of that one person somewhere who may be offended or may act badly. This makes no more sense than refusing to leave the house because someone carrying a knife may attack us, or refusing to drive a car because someone may hit us deliberately. This reductio ad absurdum is a manipulative ploy much enjoyed by those who like to control others without even trying to.
ReplyDeleteBeing sensitive to others' struggles is fine, but that's up to every individual. Being safe for a woman unfortunately requires tradeoffs and difficult choices. But we should not make hypothetical, exaggerated, or misunderstood dangers the basis of social policy.